Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Related for Rosh Hashanah 13:21

פשיטא מהו דתימא ליחוש שמא

however, the decree may be issued immediately after New Year, and even so the intercalary month must be [the second] Adar'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Sanh., Sonc. ed. p. 55 notes. (15) R. Joshua and R. Pappias. Sanh. ');"><sup>27</sup></span> - R'Nahman B'Isaac replied: What is meant here by 'leap years'? The closing of a leap year, as we have learnt: 'They's testified that the year may be declared a leap year throughout the whole of Adar, since others asserted that this could be done only until Purim.'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And once Purim had passed, the next month had to be Nisan of the next year and not the second Adar of the present year.');"><sup>28</sup></span> What was the reason of those who held that this could be done only until Purim? - Since a Master has stated that 'enquiries are made regarding the laws of Passover for thirty days before Passover,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the emissaries of the Beth din instructed the public on the matter during this time.');"><sup>29</sup></span> People might be led into neglecting the rules of leaven.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If in the interval Passover was postponed for a month, they would not observe the new date of the Passover.');"><sup>30</sup></span> What says the other to this? - He says that people know that a leap year depends on calculation, and they say to themselves that the Rabbis have only now got the calculation right.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'this calculation had not been completed by the Rabbis till now'.');"><sup>31</sup></span> What of our Tanna?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why does he not include leap years.');"><sup>32</sup></span> - He speaks only of commencements, not of terminations.' And for the offering of shekalim'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In Adar a shekel had to be contributed by every Israelite for the purchase of congregational sacrifices during the coming year.');"><sup>33</sup></span> How do we know this [from Scripture]? - R'Josiah said: The Scripture says, This is the burnt-offering of each month in its month throughout the months of the year.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Num. XXVIII, 14.');"><sup>34</sup></span> The Torah here enjoins:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By the superfluous expression, 'throughout the months of the year'.');"><sup>35</sup></span> 'Renew [the year] and bring an offering from the new contributions'. That the 'year' here commences with Nisan is learnt by analogy with the text,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'And we derive (the meaning of) " year"="" from="" "year"="" (commencing)="" with="" nisan'.');"=""><sup>36</sup></span> It is the first to you of the months o the year.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XII, 2.');"><sup>37</sup></span> But why not suppose it is Tishri from the analogy of, From the beginning of the year?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Deut. XI, 12, referring to the rainfall.');"><sup>38</sup></span> - To a year with which months are mentioned we apply the analogy of a year with which months are mentioned, but to a year with which months are mentioned, we do not apply the analogy of a year with which months are not mentioned. Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: It is proper to bring the congregational sacrifices that are offered o the first of Nisan from the new contributions. If, however, they are brought from the old, the duty has been performed,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In respect of the sacrifice itself.');"><sup>39</sup></span> but not in the most appropriate manner.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit. 'he has omitted a precept'.');"><sup>40</sup></span> It has been taught to the same effect: 'It is proper bring the congregational sacrifices which are offered on the first of Nisan from the new contributions; if, however, they were brought from the old, the duty has been performed, but not in the most appropriate manner. If a private person has offered them from his own property, they are unexceptionable, provided he hands them over to the congregation'. Surely this is self-evident? - You might think that we should have some scruples [in accepting them], in case

Tosefta Rosh Hashanah (Lieberman)

[The month] Nisan is the beginning of the year for the kings, pilgrimage festivals, months, and the collection of the temple tax. Some say: Also for renting houses. How [one should understand]: "for the kings"? [Answer:] If he dies in Adar and another takes his place in Adar, the year is counted both for him and for the other. If he dies in Nisan and another takes his place in Nisan, the year is counted both for him and for the other. If [one] dies in Adar and another takes his place in Nisan, the first [year] is counted for the first and the second [year] for the second.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Tosefta Shekalim (Lieberman)

All the congregational sacrifices are offered on the first of Nisan. And when the new moon comes in time, one sacrifice from the New, and if not, one sacrifice from the old. And if one offered [Pinge] for oneself, they were [as an offering] valid; only on the condition that they had to be handed over to the public.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse