Related for Rosh Hashanah 13:21
פשיטא מהו דתימא ליחוש שמא
however, the decree may be issued immediately after New Year, and even so the intercalary month must be [the second] Adar'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Sanh., Sonc. ed. p. 55 notes. (15) R. Joshua and R. Pappias. Sanh. ');"><sup>27</sup></span> - R'Nahman B'Isaac replied: What is meant here by 'leap years'? The closing of a leap year, as we have learnt: 'They's testified that the year may be declared a leap year throughout the whole of Adar, since others asserted that this could be done only until Purim.'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And once Purim had passed, the next month had to be Nisan of the next year and not the second Adar of the present year.');"><sup>28</sup></span> What was the reason of those who held that this could be done only until Purim? - Since a Master has stated that 'enquiries are made regarding the laws of Passover for thirty days before Passover,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the emissaries of the Beth din instructed the public on the matter during this time.');"><sup>29</sup></span> People might be led into neglecting the rules of leaven.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If in the interval Passover was postponed for a month, they would not observe the new date of the Passover.');"><sup>30</sup></span> What says the other to this? - He says that people know that a leap year depends on calculation, and they say to themselves that the Rabbis have only now got the calculation right.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'this calculation had not been completed by the Rabbis till now'.');"><sup>31</sup></span> What of our Tanna?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why does he not include leap years.');"><sup>32</sup></span> - He speaks only of commencements, not of terminations.' And for the offering of shekalim'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In Adar a shekel had to be contributed by every Israelite for the purchase of congregational sacrifices during the coming year.');"><sup>33</sup></span> How do we know this [from Scripture]? - R'Josiah said: The Scripture says, This is the burnt-offering of each month in its month throughout the months of the year.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Num. XXVIII, 14.');"><sup>34</sup></span> The Torah here enjoins:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By the superfluous expression, 'throughout the months of the year'.');"><sup>35</sup></span> 'Renew [the year] and bring an offering from the new contributions'. That the 'year' here commences with Nisan is learnt by analogy with the text,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'And we derive (the meaning of) " year"="" from="" "year"="" (commencing)="" with="" nisan'.');"=""><sup>36</sup></span> It is the first to you of the months o the year.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XII, 2.');"><sup>37</sup></span> But why not suppose it is Tishri from the analogy of, From the beginning of the year?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Deut. XI, 12, referring to the rainfall.');"><sup>38</sup></span> - To a year with which months are mentioned we apply the analogy of a year with which months are mentioned, but to a year with which months are mentioned, we do not apply the analogy of a year with which months are not mentioned. Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: It is proper to bring the congregational sacrifices that are offered o the first of Nisan from the new contributions. If, however, they are brought from the old, the duty has been performed,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In respect of the sacrifice itself.');"><sup>39</sup></span> but not in the most appropriate manner.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit. 'he has omitted a precept'.');"><sup>40</sup></span> It has been taught to the same effect: 'It is proper bring the congregational sacrifices which are offered on the first of Nisan from the new contributions; if, however, they were brought from the old, the duty has been performed, but not in the most appropriate manner. If a private person has offered them from his own property, they are unexceptionable, provided he hands them over to the congregation'. Surely this is self-evident? - You might think that we should have some scruples [in accepting them], in case